Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.47 out of 10). While Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
