Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
