Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX
