Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
