Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
57.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.73 out of 10) and the total score (7.38 out of 10). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 255g / 8,99oz and a ball bearings of 4, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.3 out of 10 (255g / 8,99oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX
