Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Beastmaster
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
74.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX and Shimano Beastmaster perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Beastmaster stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Beastmaster?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
