Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
74.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona FJ and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC
