Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X
