Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin REDIX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (8.58 out of 10). While Delphin REDIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin REDIX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
